Matches

9 September 2026. The consensus shows which outcome most authors chose and how unanimous they are. Alongside it is what the TheAnalytic models think of this match.

All leagues UEFA Champions League 0 Primeira Liga 0 Eredivisie 0 Championship 0 Primera Nacional 0 CONMEBOL Sudamericana 0 League Cup 0 Division 1 0 Pro League 0 Premier League 0 Cup 14
More 80
Time Match Picks Consensus Model Agreement
18:00 Russia · Cup Shinnik Yaroslavl — Torpedo Moskva no picks Under 3.5 Total goals (match) · 74.1% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Kaluga — FC UFA no picks Under 2.5 Total goals (match) · 79.9% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Dinamo Kirov — KAMAZ no picks Over 1.5 Total goals (match) · 73.7% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Znamya Noginsk — Ska-khabarovsk no picks No Both teams to score · 78.8% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Dinamo Barnaul — Chelyabinsk no picks Over 1.5 Total goals (match) · 76.9% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Chertanovo Moscow — FK Neftekhimik no picks Over 1.5 Total goals (match) · 76.2% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Dinamo Stavropol — Nizhny Novgorod no picks Under 3.5 Total goals (match) · 81.8% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Druzhba — Enisey no picks Under 3.5 Total goals (match) · 83.7% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup FK Sokol Saratov — Leningradets no picks Under 3.5 Total goals (match) · 77.7% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Volgar Astrakhan — Volga Ulyanovsk no picks Under 3.5 Total goals (match) · 84.1% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Volna Nizhegorodskaya — Rotor Volgograd no picks Under 3.5 Total goals (match) · 82.4% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Murom — Veles no picks Yes Both teams to score · 82.5% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Luki-Energiya — Ural no picks Under 3.5 Total goals (match) · 77.3% Log in
18:00 Russia · Cup Dinamo St. Petersburg — FC Sochi no picks Over 1.5 Total goals (match) · 74.4% Log in

How to read the consensus

The share of picks placed on the most popular outcome of the match. A high percentage means the authors agree, not that they are right: the more of them converge, the lower the odds usually are.

Model pick

The TheAnalytic models estimate market probabilities on their own and show the outcome they are meaningfully confident in — not trivial lines such as “over 0.5 goals”. There are two sources: the rating model covers corners, fouls and cards, while Dixon-Coles covers the match result and goals. Both publish on the same terms as people and stand in the shared rating.

Agreement

Whether the model considers the same outcome most likely as the majority of authors. A disagreement is nobody’s mistake but a reason to look closer: disagreements are exactly where it shows who adds value.