Matches

9 September 2026. The consensus shows which outcome most authors chose and how unanimous they are. Alongside it is what the TheAnalytic models think of this match.

All leagues UEFA Champions League 6 Primeira Liga 1 Eredivisie 1 Championship 3 Primera Nacional 1 CONMEBOL Sudamericana 2 League Cup 1 Division 1 3 Pro League 3 Serie B 2
More 81
Time Match Picks Consensus Model Agreement
19:45 World · UEFA Champions League Barcelona — Feyenoord no picks Over 1.5 Total goals (match) · 85% Log in
19:45 World · UEFA Champions League VfB Stuttgart — Viking no picks Over 2.5 Total goals (match) · 68.6% Log in
22:00 World · UEFA Champions League Liverpool — Atletico Madrid no picks Over 1.5 Total goals (match) · 83.6% Log in
22:00 World · UEFA Champions League Napoli — Arsenal no picks Over 1.5 Total goals (match) · 77.3% Log in
22:00 World · UEFA Champions League Paris Saint Germain — Slovan Bratislava no picks Over 1.5 Total goals (match) · 80% Log in
22:00 World · UEFA Champions League Sporting CP — Galatasaray no picks Over 21.5 Fouls over/under · 76.5% Log in
22:45 Portugal · Primeira Liga Moreirense — Benfica no picks Over 21.5 Fouls over/under · 83% Log in
19:45 Netherlands · Eredivisie Twente — Telstar no picks 1 Which team has more corners · 77.8% Log in
21:45 England · Championship Derby — West Brom no picks Under 3.5 Total goals (match) · 77.6% Log in
21:45 England · Championship Norwich — Birmingham no picks Over 1.5 Total goals (match) · 74.8% Log in
22:00 England · Championship Charlton — QPR no picks Under 3.5 Total goals (match) · 76.4% Log in
21:30 Argentina · Primera Nacional Defensores De Belgrano — Los Andes no picks Under 2.5 Total goals (match) · 82.1% Log in

Showing top leagues and matches with picks. Show all leagues (86)

How to read the consensus

The share of picks placed on the most popular outcome of the match. A high percentage means the authors agree, not that they are right: the more of them converge, the lower the odds usually are.

Model pick

The TheAnalytic models estimate market probabilities on their own and show the outcome they are meaningfully confident in — not trivial lines such as “over 0.5 goals”. There are two sources: the rating model covers corners, fouls and cards, while Dixon-Coles covers the match result and goals. Both publish on the same terms as people and stand in the shared rating.

Agreement

Whether the model considers the same outcome most likely as the majority of authors. A disagreement is nobody’s mistake but a reason to look closer: disagreements are exactly where it shows who adds value.